Craig Fraser, a lunatic Odinist from the British Isles who's fond of running out into the English countryside shirtless but rocking camo pants and a balaclava, whacked out of his head on psychadelic mushrooms, and performing random feats of strength with rocks and trees, hit me with a pretty interesting set of interview questions a while back. As he's finally gotten around to posting the interview, check it out while I finish up the new Fads article on the Olympic lifts: http://sigurd-strong.com/men/chaosandpain.
17 March 2014
#PureEvil Meets #MostHated- Chaos and Pain Gets Interviewed By Sigurd.
Craig Fraser, a lunatic Odinist from the British Isles who's fond of running out into the English countryside shirtless but rocking camo pants and a balaclava, whacked out of his head on psychadelic mushrooms, and performing random feats of strength with rocks and trees, hit me with a pretty interesting set of interview questions a while back. As he's finally gotten around to posting the interview, check it out while I finish up the new Fads article on the Olympic lifts: http://sigurd-strong.com/men/chaosandpain.
12 March 2014
Training For The Apocalypse, Part #1- Better To Die Slow Or Go Zombie?
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
04 March 2014
Ask The Asshole: Pullups, Food Bill, and METAL
This week I was asked more stupid fucking questions than ever in my life, and so many in one day I actually had an eye twitch by the end of it. If you can easily google something, WHY WASTE MY TIME ASKING FOR THE ANSWER? If you suck at googling, kill yourself. Moreover, if you ask my opinion on something, don't argue my fucking answer. Don't claim you're a special snowflake, assert your unique situation, or deny the fact that you have no interest in actually being a useful human being. That's not to say I won't field stupid questions. I will. I'll just beat you half to death with the answer. To wit, here was the most annoying question I received, in summary form from the hour of my time this asshole wasted on a day so annoying my eye was actually twitching by the end:
"Yesterday morning 101.3kg [222.86 lbs] at 190cm [6'2"] tall. Its around 99-101kg [~220lbs] usually and the scale weight says 23% fat but I don't trust it cos it once said 19.5%, then I lost 10kg and it said 19%." Yadda yadda yadda I don't actually want to cut and would love to waste an hour of your time but blah blah want 15% bodyfat for my set point and OH YEAH DID I MENTION I AM TERRIFIED OF LOSING ALL OF MY "STRENGTH" BUT HAVE A 400kg [880 lbs] TOTAL AND WILL FIGHT YOU AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IF YOU SUGGEST THAT I AM A SAD SACK OF FAT SHIT WHO SHOULD CUT WEIGHT AND HAVE NO STRENGTH TO LOSE?
Before I realize what a shitbird, timewasting, dickless, worthless, cocksucking asshole this kid was, I was actually pretty nice to him. I caluclated his lean body mass, which at 23% bodyfat (which is horrifyingly, inexcusably high for a male) was 171 lbs. I then multiplied that by 1.1 to figure out what he'd be with the same amount of lean mass and 10% bodyfat, and suggested that he cut to 198 lbs/90 kg, stay at that weight for six months, and then start lean bulking. The purpose of this exercise would be to overshoot his goal bodyfat set point to lower it further than need be and give him some metabolic wiggle room while he bulked.
He, however, insisted he could not cut that much weight because his "gains" would "stall". If you're an adult male totaling under 1000, you have no gains to stall or lose. Though I tried to impress this upon him, he fought me tooth and nail, insisting that his lack of gains was more special to him than other peoples'. He then told me that he had insufficient funds to actually diet, and continued to assert that he should not have to drop weight in an effort to change his body fat set point.
I cannot assert enough how stupid this line of thinking is. In fact, my sense of humor fails me when thinking about it to the point that I briefly considered buying a plane ticket to Denmark to beat this asshole into a coma for wasting multiple hours of my time (this was not the first time he did this, and even once had the audacity to literally demand that I respond to his bizarre request to Skype with me). Were I to do so, I might become the only person in history to commit mass murder using a corpse as a weapon, because I would quite like to beat the entire population of that apparently useless country to death with this kids corpse, so greatly has he annoyed me. Just grab him by the ankles and smash other people to a pulp with his bloody, lifeless body. It'd certainly be GPP, at the very least.
Back to the point, however- there is absolutely no reason why an adult male should be over 15% body fat. If your body fat is over 15%, it's because you want to be. There's no utility for the excess weight, no excuse for its existence, and whatever arguments you might proffer to the contrary are as feeble and twisted as an old woman. This genius told me that he had wide hips, so low levels of bodyfat would make him look weird. Uh huh. He also failed to kill himself when I informed him that there were multiple American women under 130 lbs who could out total him, and that he would not even be competitive against women unless he cut to the 165 lb class, so neither pride nor common sense seemed to hold much value to him.
In summary, weakness may be a crime, but so is fatness. Being both should be a capital fucking crime. In my opinion, getting lean first makes the most sense, because strength gains will not come quickly enough to overshadow the fact that a person is fat. Moreoever, it is possible to gain muscle and strength while losing fat. I've done it. And before the puppet show in the comment chimes in with allegations of steroid use, the first time I ever got significantly stronger while cutting was in Europe, and I didn't have access to any of the supplements, legal or otherwise, one might suggest are the only way to make that happen. I just ate a ton of chicken breast and lifted like a fucking lunatic twice a day, six days a week. Therefore, he could attain human form AND get stronger simultaneously by eating correctly (which I swear I have written about extensively) and lifting his fucking ass off. It's not as though he could get any weaker, so there's no reason not to cut. Given that cutting weight is apparently out of the question, he should probably head over to my newest guilty masturbation reddit for some tips on how to cut effectively, because bleeding to death is pretty much the only way this kid could drain enough shame from his body to avoid creating some sort of singularity of suck in the grand old Kingdom of Denmark... hilariously, the former land of the Vikings and now simply home to Cheetos-eating saddies.
How would you best structure workouts to progess in the pullup? I fucking suck at them.
Pullups and dips have been a bit of an obsession of mine since high school. One of the school records was in "The Circuit" which was dips, pullups, and pushups done in rounds. As soon as a round could not be completed, you were credited with the last completed round. In each round, you would do reps for that round number in each exercise with no more than 30 seconds between each exercise. Thus, round 1 was 1 rep of each, round 2 was 2 reps of each, and so on. Before I became obsessed with it, the record was 15 or 16. At graduation, I had it up to 21, and a couple of years later I pulled off an ugly and exhausting 27. I've not really bothered with it since, but I've gotten so good at pullups that even after bicep surgery and abject terror of retearing my bicep kept me from doing pullups for 10 weeks, I was still able to do multiple sets of 15 with no problem.
Rather than being some sort of Spider-Man, I developed a lot of different ways to get good at pullups, and they all seem to work universally. Pullups are, as it happens, one of those things you can't not be good at if you do them enough. As such, if you want to be good at them, doing some daily is not a terrible idea- pullups actually make for a pretty awesome upper body warmup, so doing them at the beginning of every workout can benefit you greatly.
The method I have found for getting good at pullups quickly is to set a goal total for reps and then hitting that goal any way you can. For a number of years my rep goal for pullups and dips was 100 and 300, respectively, but that got very easy, very quickly, so I bumped it to 200 and 600 and then basically quit doing them regularly because it was too time intensive and generally boring. Doing dips and pullups together lets you actively rest in between sets of each, though I'd really on rest long enough to get a drink of water every fourth or fifth set. Thus, you can condense a lot of work into a short period of time.
Structuring your rep scheme seems tricky for some people. My buddy, the guy who asked the question, can hit maybe ten on a single set of pullups but is then basically trashed, and but can do sets of 5 with no problem. That made it easy for me- I always stop about 2 or 3 reps before real fatigue starts setting in for multiple sets. I don't have a ton of repetition strength, so I can do maybe 3 sets of 20 before my reps are reduced to 8, and then 6. Sets of 15 I can do for a bit longer, so I generally do sets of 12, which I can do endlessly. For my buddy, I recommended he set a rep goal of 50 and do as many sets of 5 as he could, but keep going until he hit his goal. Once he was able to get all of his reps in sets of 5, he could do a workout with no goal reps, but just do sets of 5 until he couldn't, and that would be his new goal. Then, he could do sets of 7. That method's worked great for me over the years, and has worked for all of my training consultation clients as well.
If that strikes you as too mathematical, there's a simpler way- get a doorframe pullup bar and put it into a room into which you go regularly. Then, every time you enter or exit that room, do some pullups. If you can't do a single pullup, jump to the top and lower yourself slowly for five negatives. The negatives trick is one I picked up from an NFL trainer, and it's how they get 300 lb linemen who've never done a pullup to be able to do multiples in a couple of weeks. Every girlfriend I've ever had who sucked at pullups used it to get good at pullups, as well. Pullups, as it happens, are easier for most people to get good at than they would apparently think.
What is your grocery bill like per week/month/however you shop? The reason I ask is two fold. 1) we're both the same height, 2) how much food does it take to sustain a 200+ lb, 5.5 foot guy? I'm 150lb's and feel like I couldn't down the calories it would take to get close to the 175lb range much less into the 200lb range.
I generally shop daily, because I kind of enjoy grocery shopping and it's become an unbreakable habit. I'm assuming that this question is regarding my eating habits on the Apex Predator Diet, which everyone seems to think is a recipe for financial ruin. In spite of my degrees, I've never had a particularly well-paying job (at least insofar as what I was taught to expect after obtaining an MBA), and I've still managed to use this diet since around 2007.
My diet on the APD varies a bit, so I will use a variety of foods to give you a weekly bill.
9 lbs pork ribs: $36
9 lbs beef ribs: $22.5
1.5 lbs Bone in Ribeye: $10
5 lbs Vitamin Shoppe Whey: $50
Large Pizza: $12
Lunch at Chipotle: $10
Bag of Baked Lays: $3
20 piece McNuggets: $5
Movie popcorn: $6
Total: $154.5/week, so $618 a month, including my "entertainment" meal.
That's a rough estimate because I rotate my foods somewhat, but I would say that it is between $15 and $30 a day. As for you bodyweight and caloric needs, it really doesn't take that much in the way of calories to get to 175. I went from 150 to 175 in a few years eating chicken, rice, and broccoli three times a day, or Chipotle bowls of double chicken and rice, plus a couple of protein shakes. That probably wasn't too much over 2000 calories a day, and I steadily gained weight from 135 to 175 over the course of a few years. Then I played with macros until I leaned out and got bigger at the same weight, then kept leaning out and getting bigger.
Though it doesn't really pertain to the question above, which was apparently just an effort to get an idea of what he needed to budget for food, I continue to find it fascinating the degree to which the new breed of lifter endlessly compares themselves to their peers. We're talking everything from height to arm length to weight to the amount of sleep they get, all with the dubious goal of excusing poor performance. I'm not going to trot out the old adage about excuses- instead, I will say without equivocation that if you're doing this you are definitely an asshole, and not of the awesome Jamie Lewis variety, and that if you're that preoccupied with proffering to nameless strangers on the internets a list of reasons why you suck compared to your peers, just fucking kill yourself. You're not shit, never going to amount to shit, and you'd definitely be better off underneath the ground than above it.
Want to know how much muscular weight you can reasonably expect to gain in a week? HOW ABOUT YOU EAT A SHITLOAD OF FOOD AND TRAIN YOUR FUCKING ASS OFF IN AN EFFORT TO DISCOVER THE ANSWER FOR YOURSELF? Jesus tittyfucking christ I hate people. Motherfuckers are so busy putting arbitrary limits on themselves they never actually test their limits, then use their lack of progress stemming from a lack of effort to justify their pathetic mindset and spread it to everyone else. Fuck that shit. Push it to the fucking limit and then brag about your baddassery, not the other way around.
What are your five all time favorite Hardcore/Metalcore albums, and what bands/songs do you generally have in your lifting playlist?
Five All Time Favorite Hardcore/Metalcore Albums
Killwhitneydead- Inhaling the Breath of a Bullet
Hatebreed- Satisfaction is the Death of Desire
Hoods- Pray for Death
Throwdown- Haymaker
Candiria- Beyond Reasonable Doubt
I'd say those are unquestionably the albums to which I've listened the most over the years. Early on, it was pretty much just Earth Crisis, Snapcase, Strife, Converge, and Hatebreed, but I dropped most of those bands over the years and moved onto other shit. I love the fuck out of a lot of the newer bands, but it's hard to say if they'll remain in rotation once the shiny wears off. I'd imagine Infant Annihilator will make it into a top ten at some point, but most of that is filled out by KWD's second and third album- I don't think I've listened to a single band more than KWD, frankly, and continue to do so in spite of the Homerian tragedy unfolding with their power metal shitshow of a new album. For those of you who like power metal: Fuck you and your crew.
Ten Most Commonly Found Bands on My Lifting Playlist
Not the asshole time waster, but similarly fat.
"Yesterday morning 101.3kg [222.86 lbs] at 190cm [6'2"] tall. Its around 99-101kg [~220lbs] usually and the scale weight says 23% fat but I don't trust it cos it once said 19.5%, then I lost 10kg and it said 19%." Yadda yadda yadda I don't actually want to cut and would love to waste an hour of your time but blah blah want 15% bodyfat for my set point and OH YEAH DID I MENTION I AM TERRIFIED OF LOSING ALL OF MY "STRENGTH" BUT HAVE A 400kg [880 lbs] TOTAL AND WILL FIGHT YOU AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IF YOU SUGGEST THAT I AM A SAD SACK OF FAT SHIT WHO SHOULD CUT WEIGHT AND HAVE NO STRENGTH TO LOSE?
Before I realize what a shitbird, timewasting, dickless, worthless, cocksucking asshole this kid was, I was actually pretty nice to him. I caluclated his lean body mass, which at 23% bodyfat (which is horrifyingly, inexcusably high for a male) was 171 lbs. I then multiplied that by 1.1 to figure out what he'd be with the same amount of lean mass and 10% bodyfat, and suggested that he cut to 198 lbs/90 kg, stay at that weight for six months, and then start lean bulking. The purpose of this exercise would be to overshoot his goal bodyfat set point to lower it further than need be and give him some metabolic wiggle room while he bulked.
He, however, insisted he could not cut that much weight because his "gains" would "stall". If you're an adult male totaling under 1000, you have no gains to stall or lose. Though I tried to impress this upon him, he fought me tooth and nail, insisting that his lack of gains was more special to him than other peoples'. He then told me that he had insufficient funds to actually diet, and continued to assert that he should not have to drop weight in an effort to change his body fat set point.
Google "danish men" and all of the pictures basically look like this. I could conquer that country single-handedly, hungover on a Sunday afternoon, armed with nothing but two drink coasters and a ham sandwich.
I cannot assert enough how stupid this line of thinking is. In fact, my sense of humor fails me when thinking about it to the point that I briefly considered buying a plane ticket to Denmark to beat this asshole into a coma for wasting multiple hours of my time (this was not the first time he did this, and even once had the audacity to literally demand that I respond to his bizarre request to Skype with me). Were I to do so, I might become the only person in history to commit mass murder using a corpse as a weapon, because I would quite like to beat the entire population of that apparently useless country to death with this kids corpse, so greatly has he annoyed me. Just grab him by the ankles and smash other people to a pulp with his bloody, lifeless body. It'd certainly be GPP, at the very least.
Back to the point, however- there is absolutely no reason why an adult male should be over 15% body fat. If your body fat is over 15%, it's because you want to be. There's no utility for the excess weight, no excuse for its existence, and whatever arguments you might proffer to the contrary are as feeble and twisted as an old woman. This genius told me that he had wide hips, so low levels of bodyfat would make him look weird. Uh huh. He also failed to kill himself when I informed him that there were multiple American women under 130 lbs who could out total him, and that he would not even be competitive against women unless he cut to the 165 lb class, so neither pride nor common sense seemed to hold much value to him.
Duckface, fauxhawk, AND nipple piercings. I pulled a hat trick of douchbaggery in a single pic... but was front squatting 200kg while weighing 77 kg or so, without even the benefit of ephedrine.
In summary, weakness may be a crime, but so is fatness. Being both should be a capital fucking crime. In my opinion, getting lean first makes the most sense, because strength gains will not come quickly enough to overshadow the fact that a person is fat. Moreoever, it is possible to gain muscle and strength while losing fat. I've done it. And before the puppet show in the comment chimes in with allegations of steroid use, the first time I ever got significantly stronger while cutting was in Europe, and I didn't have access to any of the supplements, legal or otherwise, one might suggest are the only way to make that happen. I just ate a ton of chicken breast and lifted like a fucking lunatic twice a day, six days a week. Therefore, he could attain human form AND get stronger simultaneously by eating correctly (which I swear I have written about extensively) and lifting his fucking ass off. It's not as though he could get any weaker, so there's no reason not to cut. Given that cutting weight is apparently out of the question, he should probably head over to my newest guilty masturbation reddit for some tips on how to cut effectively, because bleeding to death is pretty much the only way this kid could drain enough shame from his body to avoid creating some sort of singularity of suck in the grand old Kingdom of Denmark... hilariously, the former land of the Vikings and now simply home to Cheetos-eating saddies.
Booty cleanse.
Though one day last week was so filled with insipid, lazy questions, not all of the questions I get asked give e the beginnings of a cluster headache and force me to bed at 5 PM so I can train early and then drink myself into sweet oblivion. Instead, most of them are generally interesting, and might benefit people who have the number of chromosomes a healthy individual should. Here are a couple of those.
How would you best structure workouts to progess in the pullup? I fucking suck at them.
Pullups and dips have been a bit of an obsession of mine since high school. One of the school records was in "The Circuit" which was dips, pullups, and pushups done in rounds. As soon as a round could not be completed, you were credited with the last completed round. In each round, you would do reps for that round number in each exercise with no more than 30 seconds between each exercise. Thus, round 1 was 1 rep of each, round 2 was 2 reps of each, and so on. Before I became obsessed with it, the record was 15 or 16. At graduation, I had it up to 21, and a couple of years later I pulled off an ugly and exhausting 27. I've not really bothered with it since, but I've gotten so good at pullups that even after bicep surgery and abject terror of retearing my bicep kept me from doing pullups for 10 weeks, I was still able to do multiple sets of 15 with no problem.
Rather than being some sort of Spider-Man, I developed a lot of different ways to get good at pullups, and they all seem to work universally. Pullups are, as it happens, one of those things you can't not be good at if you do them enough. As such, if you want to be good at them, doing some daily is not a terrible idea- pullups actually make for a pretty awesome upper body warmup, so doing them at the beginning of every workout can benefit you greatly.
The method I have found for getting good at pullups quickly is to set a goal total for reps and then hitting that goal any way you can. For a number of years my rep goal for pullups and dips was 100 and 300, respectively, but that got very easy, very quickly, so I bumped it to 200 and 600 and then basically quit doing them regularly because it was too time intensive and generally boring. Doing dips and pullups together lets you actively rest in between sets of each, though I'd really on rest long enough to get a drink of water every fourth or fifth set. Thus, you can condense a lot of work into a short period of time.
Structuring your rep scheme seems tricky for some people. My buddy, the guy who asked the question, can hit maybe ten on a single set of pullups but is then basically trashed, and but can do sets of 5 with no problem. That made it easy for me- I always stop about 2 or 3 reps before real fatigue starts setting in for multiple sets. I don't have a ton of repetition strength, so I can do maybe 3 sets of 20 before my reps are reduced to 8, and then 6. Sets of 15 I can do for a bit longer, so I generally do sets of 12, which I can do endlessly. For my buddy, I recommended he set a rep goal of 50 and do as many sets of 5 as he could, but keep going until he hit his goal. Once he was able to get all of his reps in sets of 5, he could do a workout with no goal reps, but just do sets of 5 until he couldn't, and that would be his new goal. Then, he could do sets of 7. That method's worked great for me over the years, and has worked for all of my training consultation clients as well.
If that strikes you as too mathematical, there's a simpler way- get a doorframe pullup bar and put it into a room into which you go regularly. Then, every time you enter or exit that room, do some pullups. If you can't do a single pullup, jump to the top and lower yourself slowly for five negatives. The negatives trick is one I picked up from an NFL trainer, and it's how they get 300 lb linemen who've never done a pullup to be able to do multiples in a couple of weeks. Every girlfriend I've ever had who sucked at pullups used it to get good at pullups, as well. Pullups, as it happens, are easier for most people to get good at than they would apparently think.
What is your grocery bill like per week/month/however you shop? The reason I ask is two fold. 1) we're both the same height, 2) how much food does it take to sustain a 200+ lb, 5.5 foot guy? I'm 150lb's and feel like I couldn't down the calories it would take to get close to the 175lb range much less into the 200lb range.
I generally shop daily, because I kind of enjoy grocery shopping and it's become an unbreakable habit. I'm assuming that this question is regarding my eating habits on the Apex Predator Diet, which everyone seems to think is a recipe for financial ruin. In spite of my degrees, I've never had a particularly well-paying job (at least insofar as what I was taught to expect after obtaining an MBA), and I've still managed to use this diet since around 2007.
My diet on the APD varies a bit, so I will use a variety of foods to give you a weekly bill.
9 lbs pork ribs: $36
9 lbs beef ribs: $22.5
1.5 lbs Bone in Ribeye: $10
5 lbs Vitamin Shoppe Whey: $50
Large Pizza: $12
Lunch at Chipotle: $10
Bag of Baked Lays: $3
20 piece McNuggets: $5
Movie popcorn: $6
Total: $154.5/week, so $618 a month, including my "entertainment" meal.
That's a rough estimate because I rotate my foods somewhat, but I would say that it is between $15 and $30 a day. As for you bodyweight and caloric needs, it really doesn't take that much in the way of calories to get to 175. I went from 150 to 175 in a few years eating chicken, rice, and broccoli three times a day, or Chipotle bowls of double chicken and rice, plus a couple of protein shakes. That probably wasn't too much over 2000 calories a day, and I steadily gained weight from 135 to 175 over the course of a few years. Then I played with macros until I leaned out and got bigger at the same weight, then kept leaning out and getting bigger.
Oh Chipotle, how I love thee.
Though it doesn't really pertain to the question above, which was apparently just an effort to get an idea of what he needed to budget for food, I continue to find it fascinating the degree to which the new breed of lifter endlessly compares themselves to their peers. We're talking everything from height to arm length to weight to the amount of sleep they get, all with the dubious goal of excusing poor performance. I'm not going to trot out the old adage about excuses- instead, I will say without equivocation that if you're doing this you are definitely an asshole, and not of the awesome Jamie Lewis variety, and that if you're that preoccupied with proffering to nameless strangers on the internets a list of reasons why you suck compared to your peers, just fucking kill yourself. You're not shit, never going to amount to shit, and you'd definitely be better off underneath the ground than above it.
Want to know how much muscular weight you can reasonably expect to gain in a week? HOW ABOUT YOU EAT A SHITLOAD OF FOOD AND TRAIN YOUR FUCKING ASS OFF IN AN EFFORT TO DISCOVER THE ANSWER FOR YOURSELF? Jesus tittyfucking christ I hate people. Motherfuckers are so busy putting arbitrary limits on themselves they never actually test their limits, then use their lack of progress stemming from a lack of effort to justify their pathetic mindset and spread it to everyone else. Fuck that shit. Push it to the fucking limit and then brag about your baddassery, not the other way around.
What are your five all time favorite Hardcore/Metalcore albums, and what bands/songs do you generally have in your lifting playlist?
Five All Time Favorite Hardcore/Metalcore Albums
Killwhitneydead- Inhaling the Breath of a Bullet
Hatebreed- Satisfaction is the Death of Desire
Hoods- Pray for Death
Throwdown- Haymaker
Candiria- Beyond Reasonable Doubt
I'd say those are unquestionably the albums to which I've listened the most over the years. Early on, it was pretty much just Earth Crisis, Snapcase, Strife, Converge, and Hatebreed, but I dropped most of those bands over the years and moved onto other shit. I love the fuck out of a lot of the newer bands, but it's hard to say if they'll remain in rotation once the shiny wears off. I'd imagine Infant Annihilator will make it into a top ten at some point, but most of that is filled out by KWD's second and third album- I don't think I've listened to a single band more than KWD, frankly, and continue to do so in spite of the Homerian tragedy unfolding with their power metal shitshow of a new album. For those of you who like power metal: Fuck you and your crew.
Ten Most Commonly Found Bands on My Lifting Playlist
- 25 ta Life: Entire Friendship, Loyalty Commitment Ep and most of Strength Through Unity
- Hatebreed: all of Satisfaction, Doomsayer, A Call For Blood, Under the Knife
- Hoods: most of Pray for Death, most of King is Dead, Ghettoblaster, Pit Beast
- World of Pain: entire s/t
- Throwdown: most of Haymaker, Vendetta, This is Where it Ends, most of Beyond Repair
- Annotations of an Autopsy: Stagebreaker, Buried in a Bad Rap, Bone Crown, Born Dead, In Snakes I Bathe
- Jerome: entire Ep
- Nasty: Generation Fuck, Look at Me and Fuck You, My Brain Went Terribly Wrong, Slaves To The Rich
- Shattered Realm: All Will Suffer, Showdown, This World is Mine, Kings Cannot Fall
- Built Upon Frustration: Immaculate Rejection, Rest of the World, Personal Game for Personal Gain, Nothing, Resurrecting, Turn My Back
Honorable Mention: Sworn Vengeance, Sworn Enemy, Full Blown Chaos, TRC, Recognize, and How It Ends are all bands I've had on my mp3 since mp3 players became a thing, and all of whom have been making it onto my lifting mix cds since the late 90s.
This was, frankly, harder to compile than I expected it to be, mostly because I've got a couple of random songs, like "Posi Holocaust" by No Zodiac that never come off my mp3 player, yet most of the rest of their stuff sucks. Another couple of songs that never get removed are "Where Will You Go?" by unknown, yet awesome Tucson band Gatrot, "Battle Lines" by E-Town Concrete, "Suckerpunch" by Get The Ammo, "Boom Snap Clap" by Irish Front, "Dreaming in Dog Years" by the Red Chord (whose singer has curiously become a cop), and "Not Dead Yet" by Hed PE. The only reason I mention those is that I'm constantly asked to suggest obscure shit, and to most of you I think it'd be considered, while hardcore kids from my generation are probably going "fuck yes" and smirking to themselves with that list.
As you might notice, all of my carefully laid plans on ordering the release of blogs fell apart once more, because my writing is driven entirely by my interest in a given subject. Thus, the exercise fads series is being delayed because the research that goes into it is frankly exhausting, I'm continuing my procrastination on my Raw Unity writeup prep/injury rehab writeup because that topic bores me beyond belief, and the Hormone and paleotard blogs were just plain forgotten about. All of those are in various stages of completion, and will come out whenever they interest me again. What does interest me is training for the apocalypse, since sports-specific training questions annoy me and it's a kind of ridiculous premise that will shed some light on how to train specifically for a given sport without making me want to suicide, so that will be the next blog, out later this week. The apocalypses I plan to cover are robopacalypse, slow apocalypse, nuclear apocalypse, and of course, zombie apocalypse, and I assure you it will be fucking epic. Until then, tits.
27 February 2014
Your Fat Is Unequivocally Your Fault #4- Body Fat Set Point Time, Bitches
For those of you who don't know, Vienna, Austria is pretty much the nicest place a person could ever live. The public transportation system can easily and quickly get you anywhere inside the city, and it's simple and cheap to travel to the rest of Europe from downtown. There's sausage everywhere, kebaps when you tire of sausage, cheap drinks, hot Germanic women, badass architecture, and absolutely no evangelical Christians. Additionally, the city is incredibly pedestrian friendly, so it's very easy to get into the habit of shopping daily for groceries. Since moving back to the states I've continued the habit of shopping daily for groceries, no matter how ridiculous or inconvenient it might be to fight the teeming, unwashed hordes and their massive shopping carts overflowing with heavily processed, high-fructose syrup-filled foods.
Do we care? Neeeeeeeeiiiiigh, I tell you. Neigh.
Interestingly, those people seem to be extremely preoccupied with other peoples' weights, as the only thing I've ever seen an obese person reading is a magazine of some sort, and the magazines in the checkout line at the grocery store are entirely preoccupied with who is too skinny, too fat, or who got skinny or fat quickly. The Kardashians, for some reason, get a free pass either way. I assume there is some sort of underground centaur fetish population in charge of People, The National Enquirer, Star, and other gossip rags, because I can't think of any other reason to have those horse-faced, pampered, useless, vapid, twats on the cover of a magazine unless the powers that be have a real hardon for people who look like human-horse hybrids.
Winner of BL season 1, fatter than he was when he first got onto the show. Success!
BL finally produced a hot contestant and they're treating her like a fucking leper. Way to pander to the saddies and fatties, guys!
Imagine my surprise, then, when the cover of every fucking magazine this week declared that the most recent winner of The Biggest Loser went too far in her weight loss pursuits. Yes, on a show when two American Olympic athletes failed dismally to win what essentially amounts to a sporting competition, no one made mention of their lack of heart, the fact that their only real option at this point is suicide, and the laughable state of American mental toughness on the cover of a magazine- instead, they lambaste a former fattie with the most cliche'd sob story on the planet for being too skinny. I don't think I'm alone in saying that a television show based around peoples' agonized decision between regaining human form or sliding into the ocean like the rest of the cetaceans did millions of years ago might be the worst idea since Paris Hilton's singing career, but if there's one thing worse than the show itself, it's the hand-wringing about the feasibility of the contestants' fat loss, their propensity for rebounding, and the fact that at least one of the contestants took the shit too seriously.
National embarrassment and stalling world champion Rulon Gardner two years after getting kicked off of BL for cheating. Olympic gold medalist returns to former glory!
We'll put aside the fact that I think that the show's hosts for The Biggest Loser and Hoarders should carry an elephant gun and a flamethrower rather than a mike, and that the only "help" the people on those shows should receive ought to come from the barrels of those aforementioned weapons. Instead, let's address the criticisms of the show, spurious as they are.
Unrealistic Expectations
If there is one thing on Earth certainly designed to consign oneself to mediocrity, it's "realistic expectations." Realistic, in this context, is a euphemism for "average" and also serves as a pretty good benchmark for determining which people should be chained together at the leg digging fucking ditches in which they'll bury the reproductive organs forcibly removed from them. As an exercise in proving my point, I googled the following: "'reasonable expectations' and 'average person'", and behold, the first search result was written by a woman who should be sent to the camps:
"Chris Powell from ABC’s Extreme Makeover was asked “For the average person, what’s a realistic expectation for weight loss?” His answer was “Take your body weight and divide it by 100. That’s the number of pounds that you can roughly expect to lose each week.” This is interesting to me because it shows that as you lose weight I cannot expect to see 2lbs each week. In fact, I should really be losing about 1.3 to 1.5 lbs a week" (Weightwatchers).To this useless sack of doughy DNA, information about reasonable expectations jammed the idea into this woman's sad, formless, pathetic bit of grey matter that weight loss of two pounds a week was simply impossible, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT SHE ASKED A PERSON WHO HOSTS A SHOW THAT PROVES THE OBVERSE IS TRUE. Simply amazing. The only thing that is unrealistic, then, for a person who attempts to set realistic expectations is the idea that they will ever drag their troglodytic, gormless, honorless, meek selves out of subhumanity and into the light of actually being human.
The Rebound
Obese people will invariably blame their genetics for their fatness. Just as stupid people blame nonexistent diseases like ADD for their failure to learn, fat people like to conjure up their DNA as the bogeyman that sneaks into their room at night and stuffs Mega Stuff Oreos down their throat as they sleep. Their rationale for this is often the same as the rationale behind The Biggest Loser's primary criticism- no matter how aggressive or awesome a fattie's weight loss, the weight almost invariably comes back.
Fatties would probably still eat it though.
It might not surprise you to discover that they are, like the "sufferers" of the dreaded ephemeral malady ADD, full of shit. Obesity is not hardwired into one's DNA- for one, it's not a disease, and for another, there are very few diseases that are actually heritable. Certainly, all of humanity is genetically coded to store body fat, as it's necessary to survive famines. Despite that fact, obesity is hardly a natural state. And before the fatties start in about their thyroids, shut the fuck up- according to statistics, only 4.6 percent of the U.S. population age 12 and older has hypothyroidism. On the other side of the coin, about 1 percent of the U.S. population has hyperthyroidism, and you don't see 25% as many people who bitch about their evil thyroids bitching about how their thyroids are killing their gainz. The thyroid/genetic issue, then, is a non-starter.
Probably more of a genetic than epigenetic mutation.
So why, then, are fatties gonna fat? If you're dying to blame the genetic bogeyman, you can start by blaming fatties' parents, who very well might have epigenetically caused their children to have a predisposition to obesity. It is possible to cause heritable changes that are not the result of changes in the DNA sequence. Thus, it is possible to create a predisposition to fatness, like pregnancy during famine, or perhaps even by maintaining a significant level of obesity in successive generations of the same family line [the aforementioned epigenetic suggestion] (Lukaszewski). That stated, however, predisposition does not in any way equal predestination, no matter how vehemently some land beast might argue, wattles jiggling furiously as Cheetos dusts wafts off their orange-stained, wildly gesticulating sausage-like fingers.
I would have fucked a fat Anna Nicole Smith until my cock fell off.
This brings us, then, to the crux of it- fat people claim they can't help being fat because the couple of times they try to look like a human being, their weight almost invariably rebounds. Somewhere between 66% and 80% of all land beasts re-fat themselves within two years, which is a pretty staggering success rate for people whose central preoccupation seems to be eating themselves to death (Voss). The culprit here, however, is not a "fat gene" or their thyroid- it's homeostasis. All living organisms have their internal systems regulated by homeostasis, which is essentially a complex process by which your body determines what is "normal" and strives to maintain normality. The human body, it seems, takes homestasis incredibly seriously- an individual's weight tends to be fairly stable over time under most conditions, and lean muscle mass and body fat are similarly stable. Even across the entire population of adult white males, the average weight of a sixty year old is only a few pounds heavier than a thirty year old (Stark). Homeostasis, then, is the process that drives your body fat set point.
Feel free to hate me because I'm beautiful.
For those of you who've never heard of the term, a body fat set point is really nothing more than the percentage of total body mass in fat that your body considers normal. Establishment of this fat set point happens over fairly long periods of time, is an extremely important factor in weight maintenance, and is governed by a complex mechanism science does not fully understand (Harris). As a former chubby kid, I found it pretty difficult to get and stay lean, initially. What I found, though, is that the longer I stayed at a given body fat, the more dietary lenience I could have and maintain my physique. From my perspective, bod fat set points are fucking awesome, because having maintained single digit body fat for the last 7 years means that I can eat pizza, chicken fingers, cheesecake, and Baked Ruffles all day for weeks at a time and not notice an appreciable difference in my abdominal vascularity, which is more important to me than the lives of 99% of the people currently populating the Earth. Having reduced my body fat set point to 6-8%, my body is basically little more than an anabolic dynamo devoted to converting all available calories to power my big, gorgeous brain and build more muscle.
Le groce.
The fatties, however, suffer from exactly the opposite metabolic shift- over time, their sloth, shitty eating habits, hangdog expressions, and chinlessness has caused their bodies to become little more than a KFC bowl- they're just failure piles in bowls of sadness. Unlike my set point, which is my best friend, confidant, consigliere, and all-around good guy, the set points of fatties are pretty much mustachioed cartoon bad guys in overcoats, only they're so evil they're cutting off chick's heads and face-raping their corpses and diddling small children with their victims' severed toes rather than tying broads to train tracks. According to Richard Keesey, who's pretty much devoted his life to the study of body fat set points, fat people who've been fat a while are fucked for a variety of reasons:
- "The diet-induced increases in fat cell number were apparently irreversible"(Keesey). That sucks hard, because while you can shrink the fat cells, you can't get rid of them altogether without surgery. Fat cells shrink and grow due to a variety of factors, and once they hit critical mass the body creates new cells to hold more fat. Weirdly, those new fat cells are hungry, and researchers have noted it's much harder for people with more fat cells than average to lose fat and remain lean than it is for people who simply have big fat cells.
- "Obese individuals... display metabolic adjustments to caloric restriction that act both to limit the loss of weight and to favor its recovery" (Keesey)- their bodies actually turn into the fat factories I jokingly described above.
- Formerly fat people have to work much harder to lose fat than real human beings. Call it karma if you want (I do), but the former land beasts have drastically lower resting metabolic rates after losing weight, so they have to eat less and work out more to maintain their weight or continue weight loss (Keesey).
Sucks for them, right? It actually gets worse- by maintaining their fatness over time, fatties actually train their brains to keep them wrapped tightly in a cocoon of cellulite-
"long-term [diet induced obesity] creates a higher body weight set-point and that weight loss induced by [caloric restriction]... provokes the brain to protect the new higher set-point. This adaptation to weight loss likely contributes to rebound weight gain by increasing peripheral ghrelin concentrations and restoring the function of ghrelin-responsive neuronal populations in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus" (Briggs).
Not exactly a machine built for war, the Trabant.
So, by getting and staying fat, fat people take a body that could have been a nuclear munitions factory in the midst of all-out war and turn it into a fucking Trabant production facility. Then, they try to pilot their shitty little plastic and sawdust Soviet vehicle through a battlefield to take out packs of M-1 Abrams by shooting fucking paperclips out of their driver's side window. They sowed the seeds of their own destruction and seem to think it's the fault of black magic, bad luck, and shitty genetics.
One Contestant Goes "Too Far"
Given this information, it should come as no shock that the contestants on Biggest Loser fail to keep the weight off- their brain, their endocrine systems, homeostasis, their shitty life habits and long track records of failure at life and statistics are against them. Apparently one contestant realized this- Rachel Frederickson. Frederickson managed to lose 110 pounds on the show itself, going from 260 to 150 at a height of 5'4". In the succeeding three months, Frederickson appears to have spent a lot of time surfing pro-ana sites, because she carved off another 40 lbs and showed up at the reunion looking like a reanimated skeleton wrapped in tan cellophane. That sparked a hell of a lot of controversy in the tabloids, it seems, because it's all they seem capable of discussing when they're not carrying on about the somehow-still-relevant aforementioned family of equine hybrids Because they're dickless idiots with no conception of what these fatties are up against, people to think it's the fault of the show itself- a People survey of its vapid, housewive-filled readership revealed the four things needed to fix the show are:
- Set limits on how much contestants can lose.
- Slow down the weight loss.
- Scale down the intensity of the workouts.
- Provide long-term support to former contestants.
Obviously, if any of that shit was implemented, that show would be off the air before the first episode of the revamped BL finished. Those suggestions are obviously the produce of the minds of gibbering idiots, because that shit would make the show even more awful than it already is, and would do nothing to address the real issue- to lower quickly their body fat setpoint, land beasts have to take drastic measures. The only useful suggestion science has yet had is to pump former fatties full of fenfluramine, a much maligned and now hard-to-find amphetamine that seems to lower your set point by drastically raising seratonin levels (Hunsinger). Given that I've met more than one person who got and stayed lean by taking Ecstasy on a regular basis, seratonin management may well play a role. I'm not a doctor and don't really give a fuck about fat people anyway. What I do know, however, is that the entire concept that a Biggest Loser contestant could "go too far" is ludicrous. Even if they killed themselves, the world would still be down a fattie, so it's a net gain for the rest of us. Drastic times call for drastic measures, and from what science says, maintaining one's obesity could only be construed as a drastic time.
The Conclusion
This brings us, then, to the rub- don't be fat. It's pretty much that simple. If you are fat, stop being fat. The bad news is it's going to suck trying to regain human form, but the good news is that once you do and maintain human form for long enough, your body will reward you by helping. I know, that was a hell of a throwaway conclusion after such a ridiculously lengthy and well researched article, but I don't give two shits about fat people.
Anorexic porn is apparently a thing.
Sources:
Briggs D, Lockie SH, Wu Q, Lemus MB, Stark R, Andrews ZB. Calorie-restricted weight loss reverses high-fat diet-induced ghrelin resistance, which contributes to rebound weight gain in a ghrelin-dependent manner. Endocrinology. 2013 Feb;154(2):709-17.
Forum Post. Women’s Running Mag. Weight Watchers. 18 Nov 2011. Web. 25 Feb 2014. http://community.weightwatchers.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?threadID=1524539
Gomez, Patrick. Biggest Loser Winner Rachel Frederickson: Did She Go Too Far? People. 5 Feb 2014. Web. 26 Feb 2014. http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20783820,00.html
Harris RB. Role of set-point theory in regulation of body weight. FASEB J. 1990 Dec;4(15):3310-8.
Hyperthyroidism. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service (NEMDIS). 26 Feb 2014. Web. 26 Feb 2014. http://www.endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/hyperthyroidism/index.aspx
Hypothyroidism. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service (NEMDIS). 26 Feb 2014. Web. 26 Feb 2014. http://www.endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/hypothyroidism/
Keesey RE, Hirvonen MD. Body weight set-points: determination and adjustment. J Nutr. 1997 Sep;127(9):1875S-1883S.
Lukaszewski MA, Eberlé D, Vieau D, Breton C. Nutritional manipulations in the perinatal period program adipose tissue in offspring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov 15;305(10):E1195-207.
Tauber, Michele. The Biggest Loser: Four Ways to Fix the Show. 10 Feb 2014. Web. 27 Feb 2014. http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20785180,00.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

























